MICROFINANCE PAPER WRAP-UP: “State of the Art of Green Inclusive Finance 2011-2019: Worldwide Status and Progress Over 10 Years,” by e-MFP Green Inclusive and Climate Smart Finance Action Group

The authors of this paper assess the evolution of the green inclusive finance sector from 2011 to 2019. This encompasses products offered by a range of types of financial ser­vices pro­viders (FSPs), including climate insur­ance as well as loans, such as for sanitation systems, renewable energy and sustainable agriculture.

The Action Group aggregated 1,130 environ­mental assessments of 866 FSPs and applied its Green Index framework to the data to quant­ify the performance of the FSPs with respect to green inclusive finance.

Among different types of organi­za­tions, banks had the highest average scores, surpassing those of non-banking finance institutions, NGOs, credit unions and government pro­grams. By region, Asian FSPs had higher average Green Index scores than did their peers else­where. In Asia, Latin America and the Carib­bean, green lending largely supported sustainable agri­cul­ture. In Europe and Africa, however, it mainly took the form of energy-efficiency or renew­able ener­gy loans.

Overall average scores remained almost con­stant throughout the period. Of the 122 FSPs that were assessed multiple times from 2011 to 2019, 41 percent improved their scores while 48 percent had declining scores. The average scores of all FSPs for external en­vironmental risk management (ensuring clients minimize their own environmental risk) and environmental strategy (the imple­menta­tion and monitoring of the FSPs’ for­mal envi­ron­mental policies) decreased. The report also cites a general decrease in the environmental train­ing of clients by FSPs.

Meanwhile, FSPs had the highest average scores in assessments of in­ternal environ­ment­al risk management, such as reducing the usage of paper or energy within their offices. Average scores in this category and in promoting green products increased from 2011 to 2019.

The authors suggest that the obstacles to green inclusive finance may be a result of too much attention on short-term efforts such as pilot projects. Instead, the authors emphasize the need for “systemic change and the institution­alisation of green practices,” including “train­ing and capacity building for clients” in order to ensure “sound and impactful delivery of green loans” as well as facilitating “the scaling up and impact of green inclusive finance.” Overall, however, the authors conclude that “there has been a positive change in the… intention of activity of FSPs” in their prac­tice of green inclusive finance “from ‘do-no-harm’ to ‘do-good.’”

This is a summary of a paper by the e-MFP Green Inclusive and Climate Smart Finance Action Group, prepared under the coordination of Dr Davide Forcella and Dr Natalia Realpe Carrillo, and published by e-MFP, June 2023, 34 pages, available at https://www.e-mfp.eu/resources/state-art-green-inclusive-finance-2011-2019.

By James Stevenson, Research Associate

Additional Resources

European Microfinance Platform homepage
https://www.e-mfp.eu/

GICSF-AG webpage
https://www.e-mfp.eu/gicsf-ag

Green Index 2.0
https://www.e-mfp.eu/sites/default/files/resources/Green_Index_Nr_2_2016.pdf

Green Index 3.0
https://www.e-mfp.eu/sites/default/files/resources/2022/11/Green%20Index%203.0_final.pdf

More paper wrap-ups from MicroCapital
https://www.microcapital.org/?s=paper

Do you know that MicroCapital publishes the MicroCapital Monitor newspaper each month? Download a sample at https://www.microcapital.org/products-page/.

Similar Posts: