WHO’S WHO IN MICROFINANCE: Gray Ghost Microfinance Fund LLC

The Gray Ghost Microfinance Fund LLC, founded in November 2003 by Robert Pattillo, manages a for-profit investment fund comprised solely of investments in microfinance funds. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Gray Ghost, a limited liability company, manages USD 75 million in total assets. Essentially, Gray Ghost’s fund is a fund of funds. It invests in microfinance funds that supply start-up and expansion capital to microfinance institutions (MFIs) worldwide. Some of Gray Ghost’s investments include USD 4.9 million in Antares Equity Participation Fund (a fund conceived by Robert Pattillo), USD 4 million in Deutsche Bank’s Global Commercial Microfinance Consortium, USD 2 million in Catalyst Microfinance Investors, and USD 2.6 million in Bellwether Microfinance Fund.

Omidyar Network, MicroPlace, Dignity Fund, & Gray Ghost Microfinance Fund Sponsor Silicon Valley MicroFinance Network Presentation by Gray Ghost Founder, Bob Patillo

Bob Patillo, founder of the Gray Ghost Microfinance Fund, will speak to the Silicon Valley Microfinance Network on Monday, May 1st at 6:00 PM. Mr. Patillo will share his thoughts on the role of private investment in the growing microfinance industry.

Microfinance institutions are increasingly finding themselves able to take on private investment capital as the transition to profit generating businesses. Mr. Patillo will speak to this evolution in the industry through his experience as a founding partner of the Gray Ghost Microfinance Fund and as a successful entrepreneur. Prior to his work at Gray Ghost, Mr. Patillo managed an industrial real estate development firm and founded the Rockdale Foundation, a family foundation with a commitment to service, social enterprise, and education. In addition, he sits on the Board of Directors for ACCIÌãN Investments, MicroVest, the Deutsche Bank Microcredit Development Fund, and Catalyst Microfinance Investors.

Microfinance Investment Funds Ranked by Size and Microcredit Allocation

FUND NAME Ranked by $ Size of Fund

SIZE OF FUND $USD

FUNDS ALLOCATED TO MICROFINANCE $USD

ROI

1. Oikocredit World Partnership Investments

304,662,000

80,764,000

2%

2. ProCredit Holding Aktiengesellschaft

110,918,700

89,181,767

5-6.5%

3. Calvert Community Investment Notes

80,000,000

20,000,000

3%

4. Dexia Microcredit Fund

51,669,512

46,334,570

5.5-7.5%

5. Blue Orchard Microfinance Securities

40,069,833

38,000,000

4.55-8.8%

6. ASN-Novib Fonds

28,421,190

9,473,730

1.20%

7. AXA World Funds

23,073,410

1,481,556

5.10%

8. MicroVest I, LP: Equity

not available

not available

7-9%

9. MicrovestI, LP: Subordinated Debt

not available

not available

4.5-6%

10. mPower Investment Program

not available

not available

0-3%

11. Impulse Microfinance Investment Fund

15,413,875

15,413,875

4%

12 Triodos Fair Share Fund

14,583,596

6,983,086

2-4%

13. Accion Investments in Microfinance

12,969,985

12,512,329

8-10%

14. responsAbility Global Microfinance Fund

11,449,977

11,449,977

3.56%

15. ALTERFIN

11,084,244

3,628,790

6%

16. Partners for the Common Good

7,095,500

300,000

3%

17. Latin American Bridge Fund

5,340,505

1,450,000

0-2.875%

18. CRESUD

2,483,480

1,490,088

2.75%

19. Global Bridge Fund

1,691,000

not available

0-2.875%

Microfinance Investment Funds Ranked by Microcredit Allocation

FUND NAME

SIZE OF FUND $USD

FUNDS ALLOCATED TO MICROFINANCE $USD

ROI

1. ProCredit Holding Aktiengesellschaft

110,918,700

89,181,767

5-6.5%

2. Oikocredit World Partnership Investments

304,662,000

80,764,000

2%

3. Dexia Microcredit Fund

51,669,512

46,334,570

5.5-7.5%

4. Blue Orchard Microfinance Securities

40,069,833

38,000,000

4.55-8.8%

5. Calvert Community Investment Notes

80,000,000

20,000,000

3%

6. Impulse Microfinance Investment Fund

15,413,875

15,413,875

4%

7. Accion Investments in Microfinance

12,969,985

12,512,329

8-10%

8. responsAbility Global Microfinance Fund

11,449,977

11,449,977

3.56%

9. ASN-Novib Fonds

28,421,190

9,473,730

1.20%

10. Triodos Fair Share Fund

14,583,596

6,983,086

2-4%

11. ALTERFIN

11,084,244

3,628,790

6%

12. CRESUD

2,483,480

1,490,088

2.75%

13. AXA World Funds

23,073,410

1,481,556

5.10%

14. Latin American Bridge Fund

5,340,505

1,450,000

0-2.875%

15. Partners for the Common Good

7,095,500

300,000

3%

16. Global Bridge Fund

1,691,000

not available

0-2.875%

17. MicroVest I, LP: Equity

not available

not available

7-9%

18. Microvest I, LP: Subordinated Debt

not available

not available

4.5-6%

19. mPower Investment Program

not available

not available

0-3%

Wall Street Journal Features Microfinance Investment as “A New Way to Do Well by Doing Good”

Microfinance investment as a stand-alone category made headlines in today’s Wall Street Journal. While this article probably represents the culmination of a break-out year for microfinance investment, we still have a lot of work to do. The Journal describes the investment options as “small change”.

Quoting from the WSJ  

Small Change

Here is a sampling of microfinance investment vehicles. Several Web sites, such as www.mixmarket.org and www.microcapital.org, also list a number of investments.

INVESTMENT

MINIMUM

COMMENT

Calvert Foundation Community Investment Notes www.calvertfoundation.org

$1,000

Investors can earmark the notes to be invested in microfinance initiatives. Notes can earn up to 3%, depending on the note term.

Oikocredit USA Global Community Note www.oikocredit.org

$1,000

The capital raised from the notes is used to help finance various microlenders. Investors can choose returns of up to 2%.

MicroVest I Fund www.microvestfund.com

$100,000. Only available to accredited investors.

Fund makes both debt and equity investments in microlenders. Equity partners can expect to earn 7% to 9% annualized returns, while debt investors might earn 4.5% to 6%.

Accion Investments www.accion.org

$250,000. Only available to accredited investors.

Makes equity investments in microlenders and expects to generate about 8% to 10% annual returns.

Grameen Foundation USA Growth Guarantees www.gfusa.org

$1 million minimum letter of credit.

Guarantors do not contribute any money or get an upfront charitable deduction. Instead, they provide letters of credit which help guarantee loans by the lenders in developing countries.

Why Are So Few Micro-banks Profitable?

There are about 300 commercially viable microfinance institutions (MFIs) worldwide. The total investment portfolio for these institutions is estimated to be $3.5 billion and is growing at a rate of 20-30% per year. Those MFIs, however, are rarities among the 10,000 MFIs operating today. So what separates the few commercially viable MFIs from the huge host of laggards?

MFIs are hindered by internal and externally constraints. Internally, microfinance institutions must overcome:

Lack of professional capacity: MFIs are located in developing countries, and recruiting experienced management staff and loan officers can be challenging.
Lack of expertise: While the
World Bank’s microfinance research organization has developed best practices standards for MFIs, the vast majority of MFIs lack the wherewithal to access and implement these standards.
Inherent challenges of serving the poor: There is a large demand for financial services in rural markets, which are difficult to serve because of
transportation costs and a lack of infrastructure. Rural residents rely heavily on agriculture for income, which can be unpredictable and make lending risky.
Lack of portfolio diversity: When MFIs focus on providing one type of service—for example, a focus on loans for agricultural development to the rural poor—they are more exposed to risk.
To protect themselves from risk, MFIs must provide a wide variety of services.

Externally, MFIs are constrained by the following factors:

Abundant donor capital: MFIs have little incentive to become profitable if donations sustain them. Donations eliminate the incentive to abide by best practices standards and become more efficient. When MFIs receive funding from outside donors, their focus shifts to catering to what the donors want, not what the customers want.
Government Regulations:
Interest rate regulations prevent MFIs from recouping their costs and force opaque reporting.
Unfair Competition: Donor-subsidized MFIs and government programs often charge below market rates and
undercut those striving for profitability.
Corruption:
When local and national governments suffer from corruption and bureaucratic incompetence, it hinders the ability of all businesses—including MFIs—to run efficient operations.
Inherent challenges of emerging markets: An
absence of ‘soft infrastructure’ in the developing world such as credit bureaus, human resources agencies, and market research firms severely complicates doing business.

Additional Resources

1) “Commercial Microfinance: The Right Choice for Everyone?”
2) "The Impact of Interest Rate Ceilings on Microfinance." CGAP. May 2004
3)
“Expanding Commercial Microfinance in Rural Areas: Constraints and Opportunities.”
4) “Microcredit Interest Rates.”
5) Subscription only: "Strategies That Fit Emerging Markets." Harvard Business Review: June 2005
6) “The Influence of Donors on Microcredit Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Microcredit Programs in Vietnam.”